Category Archives: Uncategorized

Peer Review History: An Analysis on the Application of Herbal Nanotechnology in Treating Cancer cell

Posted on by

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Sherin Manaa, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Abbas Rahdar, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

 

Peer Review History: Influence of Downward Tapping Delay on Agronomic Parameters of Upward Tapping Rubber Trees

Posted on by

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Kuswanto, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Pankaj Kumar Ray, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

 

Peer Review History: Experience of Perceived Stress and Associated Factors during COVID 19 Lockdown among Hoteliers of Pokhara, Nepal

Posted on by

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Muhammad Zia-Ur-Rehman, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Patel Mona Rajendrakumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Ana Quenia Gomes Da Silva Allahdadi, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

 

 

Peer Review History: Survey on the Incidence of Covid19 Among Dentists Working in Dental Hospital Attached with Dental College

Posted on by

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Dharmashree Satyarup, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Indriati Paskarini, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Suharmanto, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

 

Peer Review History: Prospects for Improving Building Maintenance Management in Nigerian Public Universities: A Case Study of Nnamdi Azikiwe University

Posted on by

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Zul-Atfi Ismail, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Nur’ain Binti Ismail, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

 

Peer Review History: Evaluation of Anti Carcinogenic Activity of Trifolium pratense on Oral Cancer Cell- An in vitro Study

Posted on by

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Kallol Bhattacharjee, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Umashankar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

 

Peer Review History: Production and Characterization of Paper Board Mill ETP Sludge Derived Hydrochar

Posted on by

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Noha Elhalawany, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Asok Kumar Dikshit, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

 

Peer Review History: A Multi-Component Cognitive Stimulation Program among Older People with Dementia in Day Care Centers of Taiwan: A Pilot Study

Posted on by

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

The peer review history will be available very soon.

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Petar Avramovski, North Macedonia) | File 1 | NA 

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Victoria Katawera, Sierra Leone) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA

 

Peer Review History: Knowledge and Practices of Ayurvedic Preventive Measures for Respiratory Tract Infections among the in Tern Medical Officers at National Institute of Traditional Medicine

Posted on by

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Alfred Ofori Agyemang, Ghana) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Timothy Omara, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

 

Peer Review History: Community Acquired Pneumonia Due to Mycoplasma pneumoniae versus Non-Mycoplasma Pneumoniae: A Comparative Analysis from a Tertiary Care Hospital

Posted on by

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 7.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Durvanei Augusto Maria, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mohd Idrus Haji Mohd Masirin, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA