Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Hayder M. Al Kuraishy, Iraq) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Cristina Romero López, Spain) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.23/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mayowa Jeremiah Adeniyi, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Abhilasha Saxena, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Juwita Sahputri, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Tilahun Bogale, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Tajudeen Olusegun Rasheed, Belize) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ayse Nur Aksoy, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Shigeki Matsubara, Japan) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Sylven Masoga, South Africa) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mohammad Attaullah, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Shaukat Ali, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (K. Latha, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Haytham M. M. Daradka, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.45/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Shanthala J, India) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Aoufa Mushtaq, India) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (U. S Jijith, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Venkatesh Kamath B, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Syed Mohd Abbas Zaidi, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Walter Belda Junior, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Muhas C Ktn, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Happy Chuta, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (A Julie Christy, India) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA