Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Desalegn Alemayehu, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ioana Roman, Romania) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/1
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ikhwanul Qiram, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Balarak Davoud, Iran) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.36/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Shahram Saeidi, Iran) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Isra Natheer Alkallak, Iraq) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (C.K. Gomathy, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Zafar Javed Khan, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Luay Abed Ali Al-Helaly, Iraq) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Carlos Eduardo Rodriguez Molano, Colombia) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Yesudass Dominic Ravichandran, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Prasad. N. L, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.26/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.22/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Kassa Tarekegn, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Barlin Orlando Olivares Campos, Spain) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Alvaro-Martín Gutiérrez-Malaxechebarría, Colombia) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mohammad J. Al Jassani, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Hareendran A, India) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Nihad Khalawe Tektook, Iraq) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Journal Change | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v2 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mariana fortunate Donadon, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (M. P. Somashekar, India) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Ramya K R, UAE) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Awaludin Adam, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Vardi Venkateswarlu, India) | File 1 |NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (M. Mohamed Jeyavuthin, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Arif Mehmood Khattak, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Muhammad Sajjad Ali Khan, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (P. Karthiksankar, India) | File 1 |NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_5 (P. Xavier, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA