Author Archives: sdiarticle4

Peer Review History: The Potential Hepatoprotective and Antioxidant Activities of Astragalus davisii against Paracetamol Induced Liver Damage in Rats

Posted on by

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Dolores Castañeda Antonio, Mexico) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (K. Bala Sirisha, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

 

Peer Review History: Kinetics of Anaerobic Digestion of Unripe Plantain Peels

Posted on by

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Maryama Hammi, Morocco) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Arun Kanti Guha, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Irma Pérez Silva, México) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

 

Peer Review History: Microbial Assessment of Fresh and Frozen (For Four Days) Marine Najil Fish (Plectropomus pessuliferus)

Posted on by

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Srishti Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Muna  Sameer Al-rawi, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

 

Peer Review History: Effects of Different Fertilizers on Yield and Vitamin C Content of Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis) ̶ A Review

Posted on by

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (R. S. Choudhary, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Rajesh Chauhan, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 |NA

 

Peer Review History: Analysis of the Turnover of Herbal Medicines in Pharmacy Organizations and Directions for Increasing Sales of Pharmaceutical Products

Posted on by

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Cristian Catalin Gavat, Romania) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Vedamurthy Joshi, India) | File 1 |NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Nandhagopal K, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

 

Peer Review History: The Use of Ultrasonic Instrumentats in the Dental Practice

Posted on by

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Shohreh Ghasemi, USA) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Igna Cornel, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (S. Devakumari, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

 

Peer Review History: Die Attach Process Defect Mitigation through Design Improvement on Anvil Block Tooling

Posted on by

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Chalermsak Sumithpibul, Thailand) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Charles L Arvin, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

 

Peer Review History: Biodiesel Production from Human Faeces via Soxhlet Extraction with Hexane and Transesterification Reaction

Posted on by

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Nurhanna Badar, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Nasruddin, S T, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (C. Karthikeyan, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

 

Peer Review History: Effects of Yeast Concentration and Total Soluble Solids on the Quality of Wine Produced from Pineapple

Posted on by

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 |NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Sunjit Kaur Dhillon, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Solange De Sousa, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

 

Peer Review History: Spirituality and Women Business Leaders: Evidence from Small & Medium Entrepreneurs in Sri Lanka

Posted on by

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.14/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Kasula Siddartha, India)| File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Atishey Mittal, India)| File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Bello, RS, Nigeria)| File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Avuthu Lalitha, India)| File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_5 (R R Kavitha, India)| File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1| File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1| File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1| File 1 | NA