Author Archives: SDI Editor

Peer Review History: Case Report on Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia B-Cell

Posted on by

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Manar M. Ismail, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Yuan-I Chang, Taiwan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

 

Peer Review History: Assess the Knowledge of Women on Zinc Supplementation with ORS in the Management of Diarrhea

Posted on by

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 5.36/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Md. Abdul Quddus, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (A. M. Hoque, South Africa) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Unyime Israel Eshiet, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Knowledge, Attitude and Beliefs of Parents Regarding Fever in Children

Posted on by

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Simona Dumitra, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Gholamreza Soleimani, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Blood Profile and Selected Organ Histopathology of Balami Sheep Fed Shea Cake (Vitellaria paradoxa) Meal

Posted on by

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Endang L. Widiastuti, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Soad Ibrahim El Naggar, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

 

Peer Review History: An Analysis on the Application of Herbal Nanotechnology in Treating Cancer cell

Posted on by

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Sherin Manaa, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Abbas Rahdar, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

 

Peer Review History: Hepatoprotective Effects of Calotropis procera (Ait.) R. Br Root Bark Extracts against Diethylnitrosamine Induced Liver Injury in Rats

Posted on by

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Saurabha Bhimrao Zimare, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Abhijeet Ojha, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

 

Peer Review History: Effectiveness of Planned Teaching Programme on Knowledge Regarding Reproductive Health among Adolescent Girls in Selected Higher Secondary Schools in Kollam, District

Posted on by

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Deepti Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mohamed EL Hioui, Morocco) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Pravabati Guru, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

 

Peer Review History: Determination of Ballistic Six Exercises and Theraband Exercises on Physical Performance in Badminton Players: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Posted on by

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Tandiyo Rahayu, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Jon Mikel Picabea Arburu, Spain) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

 

Peer Review History: Methanol Extract of Azanza garckeana Fruit Pulps Protects against Formalin-Induced Reproductive Toxicity in Adult Albino Male Mice

Posted on by

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Vitória Segabinazzi Foletto, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Avadhesh Kumar Koshal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

 

Peer Review History: Mapping of Lymphatic Filariasis by Observation of Elephantiasis in Enugu State, Southeastern Nigeria

Posted on by

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ahmmed Bayo Opalekunde, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Roch Cristian Johnson, Benin) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA