Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Thadikamala Sathish, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Monsi Tombari Pius, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ramesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mohini Chetan Kuchekar, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mariusz Szymanek, Poland) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Nor’Aishah Binti Hasan, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.7/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Marwa Abd El-Gawad Ahmed Mousa, Egypt) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Toru Horinouchi, United Kingdom) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Razieh Parizad, Iran) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
.
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Sutanto Soehodho, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Haoyu Zhang, Belgium) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 |File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1| File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Inyang Okon Oyo-Ita, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Isichei, Tina Olubukola, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Fulya Ustun-Alkan, Turkey) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sapna Raghav, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ana Carolina Lyra de Albuquerque, Brazil) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Shaima Ibraheem Chyad AL-Khazraji, Iraq) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Amal Ajaweed Sulaiman, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Norbert De Kimpe, Belgium) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ana Carolina Oliveira da Silva Gambôa, Brazil) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Rebeca Garcia Macedo, Mexico) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Said Sani Said, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Juan Eliezer Zamarripa Calderón, México) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ioannis Tzoutzas, Greece) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA