Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (M. Kandeeban, India) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Subhash Chand, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.25/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Nihad Khalawe, Iraq) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Dashipour Alireza, Iran) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Daniel Kamau, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Shashkova Nina, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Satyanarayana Turangi, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mukundbhai A. Patel, India) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Journal Change | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.25/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Indraneel Mukhopadhyay, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Roshan Telrandhe, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (P.Sengottuvel, India) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Suwinto Johan, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (C. Cinthia Fernandaz, India) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sri Harini, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 |Peer review report_1 (P.Natarajan, India) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (N.Sharmili, India) | File 1 |NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Kennedy Nyeseh Ofori, Ghana) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (K. Sathyamurthi, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Cretan Remus, Romania) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mohammed Yusuf Alkali, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA