Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History :
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Okpashi, Victor Eshu, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Eguaoje Abiodun Stanley, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.25/10
Peer Review History :
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Barack Wamkaya Wanjawa, Kenya) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sudindra V R, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (P. Karthikeyan, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Felix Ebun Araoye, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_5 (Hamed Taherdoost, Canada) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History :
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Olutosin A. Otekunrin, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Julia Nelson, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.25/10
Peer Review History :
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ira Arundina, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ariana José Barreira Teles, Portugal) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History :
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Parikh Hemant, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Fengyang Huang, México) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Diyah Fatmasari, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Peer Review History :
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Kabbale Fredrick George, Uganda) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Nur Alvira Pascawati, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10
Peer Review History :
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Marwa Derma, Egypt) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mohamed E. E. Shams, Egypt) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.25/10
Peer Review History :
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Lucíola Lucena de Sousa, Brazil) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Nicolae Angelescu, Romania) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10
Peer Review History :
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Anne Caroline Gercina, Brazil) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ana María Erazo Coronado, Colombia) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History :
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ricardo Gassmann Figueiredo, Brazil) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Gabrielle Limeira Genteluci, Brazil) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA