Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.7/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Heba Gamal Abd El-Aziz Nasr, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Leila Luíza Conceição Gonçalves, , Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Nuket Ozkavruk Eliyatkin, Nuket Ozkavruk Eliyatkin) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.6/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ekaterini  Simões Goudouris, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Veeravan  Lekskulchai, Thailand) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1| File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.2/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1(Mohd Abid Siddiqui, India)| File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2(Marcelo Simões Mendes, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3(Alan Garfield, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.3/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (John Walsh, Vietnam) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 |Peer review report_2 (M. V. Chandramathi, India)| File 1 | NA

Stage 2 |Peer review report_3 (António Geraldo Manso Calha, Portugal) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Reviewers and Editors: This manuscript was reviewed and approved by ICCRM-2019* Organising committee.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.2/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 |Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 |Peer review report_1 (Eliud Garry Michura, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 |Peer review report_2 (Thokozani Simelane, South Africa) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2| File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3| File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 |Revised_MS_v4_and_Feedback_v4 | File 1 | NA

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 |Peer review report_1 (R. K. Lal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 |Peer review report_2 (R. Mahalakshmi, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA