Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Bharti, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Márcio Avelino Sinoia Luís,  Africa) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Amit Kumar Jain, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Teguh Arie Sandy, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Isaac Kofi Nti, Ghana) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Uchejeso Mark Obeta,   Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Iman Samy Elsaid Ali, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Diana Cecilia Tapia Pancardo, Mexico) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ana Paula Marques Ramos, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Irineu da Silva, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Shailesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Habtamu Zeleke Utta, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Manoj  Kanti Debnath, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Kishore Mohan K.B, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Hasta Handayani Idrus, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Alexis Mendoza-León, Venezuela) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Kuo-Chen Chou, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Adriana Peña Pérez Negrón, Mexico) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Deepti Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Atobla Koua, Côte d’Ivoire) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Rasha Mohamed Elkenany, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.25/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Saeed Nosratabadi, Hungary) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Jemimah Ayuma Simbauni, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA