Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Zachariah Chowdhury, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Barosa, Joao, Portugal) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Ebru Ipek Turkoglu, Turkey) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Elizzandra Marta Martins Gandini, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Andrezza Mara Martins Gandini, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Anna Carla Alberto-Silva, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Josiane Moreira da Costa, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Afifa Razi, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Farzaneh Bozorg-Ghalati, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Massimo Giusti Università di Genova, Italy) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Myat Phone Kyaw, Myanmar) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Veeresh Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.25/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Suyog Sindhu, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Vikas Jaiswal, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Avvaru Srinivasulu, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (G. Stephen, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v4_and_Feedback_v4 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v3 | File 1 | NA

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Alison Honório de Oliveira, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Asna Khan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Hugo Ruiz – Eraso, Colombia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Uasley Caldas De Oliveira, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Raffaele Pezzilli, Italy) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Abdullah Hizir Yavuzsan, Turkey) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA