Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History :

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Dione Richer Momolli, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Iowna Rybakowska, Poland) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.25/10

Peer Review History :

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Lidiane Cristina Machado Costa, Brasil) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Nicolae Bacalbasa, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History :

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Gladys Velazco de Maldonado, Venezuela) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Yours sincerely, Turkey) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 1 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History :

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mohammed Nahidh, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Cherif Adel Mohsen, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History :

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Avik Narayan Chatterjee, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Dakshita Joy Sinha, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.25/10

Peer Review History :

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Zainab Mahmood Aljammali, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ivana Šutej, Croatia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History :

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Dana Maria Copolovici, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Nahid Rajai, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History :

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Natalia Hristova Grancharova, Bulgaria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Daniele Zendrini Rechenchoski, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History :

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Md. Ismail Hossain, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Arbiya Anjum S India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History :

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mazin Nadhim Mosa Al-Ugla, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Hosein Kimiaei-Asadi, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA