Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 5.2/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.3/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1(Saidna Zulfiqar Bin-Tahir, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 |Peer review report_2(Aina, Jacob Kola, South Africa)| File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer review report_3(Luqman Rababah, Jordan) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 |Peer review report_4(Anthony Wong, Hong Kong) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_5(Ajayi C. Omoogun, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1(Saidna Zulfiqar Bin-Tahir, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Re-Review report_2_v1(Aina, Jacob Kola, South Africa)(Declined) | NA | NA
Stage 2 |Re-Review report_3_v1(Luqman Rababah, Jordan) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Re-Review report_4_v1(Anthony Wong, Hong Kong) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v2(Saidna Zulfiqar Bin-Tahir, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Re-Review report_4_v2(Anthony Wong, Hong Kong) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 |Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA