Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.24/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.1/10

Peer Review History:

---

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

---

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1(Chun Yang, Taiwan) | File 1 | NA

---

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2(Asti Meiza, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

---

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3(Marcelo Simões Mendes, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

---

Stage 2 | Peer review report_4(M. V. Chandramathi, India) | File 1 | NA

---

Stage 2 | Peer review report_5(Shiv Balak, India) | File 1 |NA

---

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

---

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

---

Stage 3 | Re-Review report_1_v1(Chun Yang, Taiwan) | File 1 | NA

---

Stage 3 |Re-Review report_2_v1(Asti Meiza, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

---

Stage 3 | Re-Review report_3_v1(Marcelo Simões Mendes, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

---

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

---

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

---

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback | File 1 | NA

---

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA

---

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v4_and_Feedback_v4 | File 1 | NA

---