Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.82/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.3/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ricardo Luís Lima Vitória, Brazil) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sie Long Kek, Malaysia)| File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Orchidea Maria Lecian, Italy) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Tetiana V. Obikhod, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_5 (Omonile, Jacob Funsho, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Re-Review report_2_v1 (Sie Long Kek, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Re-Review report _4_v1 (Tetiana V. Obikhod, Ukraine) (Decline) | NA | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Revised MS v3 and Feedback v3 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA