Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.54/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

---

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

---

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Eze Ejike Daniel, Uganda) | File 1 | File 2

---

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Wilson Obidah, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

---

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (L. Hariprasath, India) | File 1 | File 2

---

Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Heba Gamal Abd El-Aziz Nasr, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

---

Stage 2 | Peer review report_5 (Cherry Bansal, India) | File 1 | NA

---

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

---

Stage 2 | Re-Review report_2_v1 (Wilson Obidah, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

---

Stage 2 | Re-Review report_3_v1 (L. Hariprasath, India) | File 1 | NA

---

Stage 2 | Re-Review report_4_v1 (Heba Gamal Abd El-Aziz Nasr, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

---

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

---

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

---

Stage 3 | Revised MS v3 and Feedback v3 | File 1 | File 2

---

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA

---

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

---

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA

---