Peer Review History: From Hypotheses and Working Scenarios to Arguments Aimed at Alternating Traditional Training with Computer-Assisted Training

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (S.S.Sridhar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Amin Amani, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Noor Kadhim Ayoob, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA